by Jack Fitzpatrick
Hello all. A couple of weeks ago I was asked if I'd put together some sort of report on where we stand with electronic resources in AubieCat. Although I happened to be the one asked to write the report, many people are involved in this process. Paula Sullenger, Tom Sanders, our student employees, the catalogers and the subject specialists - all these people have devoted a great deal of time and effort into getting these titles into the catalog.
First, I'd like to bring you up to date. As many of you are aware, last fall the decision was made to add records for serials for which we have access through our aggregator subscriptions - ABI/Inform, Business and Industry, etc. - and we have made great strides in this project. At the same time, we were also trying to insure that the titles in some of our other, smaller, packages had made it into the catalog. All titles from Project Muse, JSTOR, the Ovid Biomedical collections and others are now in AubieCat. Another large category of materials are those for which the publishers provide access to the electronic counterpart of the print, so long as we continue to maintain a current print subscription. We wanted the catalog to reflect this extra access as well. Then there were the free resources, the standalone databases, and various other resources related in some way to titles we hold in print - all of these needed to be added to the catalog.
At present there are some 4285 links from titles in the catalog to electronic resources. For electronic serials, we list and maintain holdings (coverage) information.
For maintenance purposes, we needed to code these records in such a way that we could retrieve titles from various categories. For instance, we have access to many Springer-Verlag titles, and since their coverage online is subject to change, we needed to be able to pull a list of these and have student employees check our data against theirs.It occurred to us that at the same time, we should be able to use this coding to aid reference personnel and collection development subject specialists. We wanted to make it possible to do things like retrieve a list of titles in Project Muse for which we also had current print subscriptions. To accomplish all of this, we used the 710 tag on the bibliographic record. Normally used to provide an added entry for a corporate name, we have in the past utilized this field to track titles in the microfiche collection Statistical Reference Index. The nice thing about using this tag is that anyone who knows the codes can retrieve alphabetical lists of titles by doing an author search from the OPAC. Here's how.
If you go to the web OPAC, choose the Author/Title/Subject search screen, and do an author search for "QEJ", you'll see a list of all 38 categories of ejournals in the catalog, as shown below. Clicking on any one heading will retrieve a list of titles within that category.
Selecting one of the headings will give you a list of titles. I've selected QEJFC APS, which will return a list of American Physical Society publications that we can access electronically (as long as we keep the current subscriptions.)
By now you're probably wondering what these odd-looking codes mean. We began by dividing these resources into three basic types: QEJ, QER, and QR (the Q, by the way, is used to discourage false hits). These codes, entered into the 710 subfield a, represent Electronic Journals, other Electronic Resources, and Related resources respectively. In addition, we wanted to be able to distinguish them by acquisition type. F is the qualifier that stands for Free, K for part of a package, etc. QEJFC, for instance, means that access is Free as long as we have a Current subscription. After each QEJ code in the table above, is another group of letters. This is from the subfield b of the 710, and can represent one of three things: either it's a package/aggregator (e.g., ABI), a publisher (e.g., SPRINGER) or more information regarding the category.Sometimes it can be a bit redundant, as in the case of FEJ for Free Electronic Journal - we already know that - but as we'll see for the QR category, this field can be quite informative. You should be aware that when you retrieve a single record for one of these titles, these codes do not display; the only way to see them is by doing some sort of author search, or to check the MARC record itself.
Below is a complete list of Subfield A categories and qualifiers, and Subfield B Codes. We will also maintain a current list of these codes at: http://www.lib.auburn.edu/catalog/sercat/codes.html.
QEJ Electronic Journal QER Other electronic resource QR Related electronic resource
C We also have a current print sub. F Free, no strings attached FC Free as long as we maintain a current subscription to the print G We receive free print version also K Part of a package M Microforms and Documents also receives this title N We receive through NAAL membership O Other (see note field on MFHD) P Paid separately X Link temporarily disabled (site undergoing revision, etc.)
ABI ABI/Inform ASFTE Academic search FULLTEXT Elite (Ebscohost) AIP American Institute of Physics AMS American Mathematical Society APS American Physical Society BIDB Business & Industry Database CBI Core Biomedical I CBII Core Biomedical II CBIII Core Biomedical III CORC Free site from the CORC database CORCA Free "authority" site from the CORC database DBI Doing Business in ... (Ernst & Young Series) EAA Expanded Academic ASAP (InfoTrac) ELSV Elsevier Publisher FDB Free Database FEJ Free Ejournal FMG Free Monograph IOP Institute of Physics JSTOR the JSTOR package MUSE the Project Muse package PDB Paid Database PEJ Paid Ejournal RLO Related - Latest Only RNA Related - Now Available at RR Related Resource RSA Related - Selected Articles RSC Royal Society of Chemistry SIAM Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics SPRINGER Springer-Verlag Publisher
Searching QER as an author retrieves the following list:
| # | Titles | Heading | Heading Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | QERF CORC | corporate name |
| 2 | 1 | QERF CORCA | corporate name |
| 3 | 6 | QERF FDB | corporate name |
| 4 | 2 | QERF FMG | corporate name |
| 5 | 2 | QERN PDB | corporate name |
| 6 | 22 | QERP PDB | corporate name |
The first two listings are for the CORC records; look for many more of these to be added in the near future. Following that are 6 free databases, a few monographs, databases from NAAL, and finally the 22 Paid Databases. Selecting that heading will retrieve a fairly good list of the major databases to which we subscribe. Of course there are more than 22 - we are working on adding titles to this list.
Doing an author search for QR will return the list below.
| # | Titles | Heading | Heading Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | QR RLO | corporate name |
| 2 | 4 | QR RNA | corporate name |
| 3 | 30 | QR RR | corporate name |
| 4 | 5 | QR RSA | corporate name |
These Related Resources are ones for which it was not deemed necessary to input either a separate bibliographic record, or to attach a World Wide Web location holdings record to an entry already in the catalog. Instead, the URL goes in the bibliographic record, and serves as a type of note. For instance, the RLO records will have a clickable note that says something like "Latest Issue at http://www...", but the holdings will only list the print issues held by the library. The RNA code is one we'll be adding more of soon. This code indicates that the resource is "Now Available at http://www...". Quite soon, we'll want to search the catalog for print records which have been cancelled in favor of electronic equivalents, and add URLs to them.
Using keyword searching, it is quite possible to build queries that return very specific subsets of our electronic resources. But the searcher should bear in mind the fact that we were initially adding these 710 codes primarily for our use in Cataloging - they may not return the exact lists that you'd like to have. Let us know what you'd like to see, and we'll try to add codes or qualifiers to make it happen. Please, though, do so as soon as possible. With only four thousand records, it would not be too impractical for us to do some redesigning of the coding. But as that number gets larger it will become harder to do so. So experiment, tell us what you need, and we'll do our best to provide it for you.
In addition to the 4000 or so URLs that we know of in the catalog, there are many others - I call them "outlaws". These are URLs that arrive unannounced, usually on MARCIVE tapes or on OCLC records downloaded to the system. As we run across these, we are adding 710 codes when appropriate (we don't do so for Government Documents). We will try to make sure that these URLs do indeed lead to an active site.
Voyager 98.1 came with a canned report that checks all of the clickable 856 URLs in the system. We run this report every other Monday, and with it we can at least insure that most URLs link to something. We can't, however, be certain that our description is still correct - the site may have been modified, it may no longer be free, etc. To do that, we need to have someone actually click on the link, visit the site, and compare it to the record in our catalog. We've found that last step is quite important. Let me give you an example.
The HFG review is a free semiannual publication reporting on the activities of the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation. It was available on the web at www.hfg.org, and my link-checking program was reporting no errors with the link. However, in October of last year I visited the site and was surprised to find not the HFG review, but a site called "Hacking for Girlies".It's not quite as bad as it sounds. The site included a complete set of instructions on how you can hack into other people's web servers and replace their content with your own. The site was mounted anonymously, (and illegally? - I think so) apparently by a couple of young women involved in this sort of thing. Eventually they were chased off, the HFG review is back online, and we're more conscientious about personally checking these sites and not relying on automatic link-checking.
We are taking requests! If you know of a web site that you think should be added to the catalog, please let the subject specialist know. They will review the site, send Paula or me the information, and the resource is most likely on its way into the catalog.
Back to Table of Contents